AtCoder Beginner Contest 240
翻译中…
Problem Statement
翻译中…
You are given a string $S = s_1 s_2 \ldots s_N$ of length $N$ consisting of $0$'s and $1$'s.
翻译中…
Find the maximum integer $K$ such that there is a sequence of $K$ pairs of integers $\big((L_1, R_1), (L_2, R_2), \ldots, (L_K, R_K)\big)$ that satisfy all three conditions below.
翻译中…
$1 \leq L_i \leq R_i \leq N$for each$i = 1, 2, \ldots, K$.$R_i \lt L_{i+1}$for$i = 1, 2, \ldots, K-1$.- The string
$s_{L_i}s_{L_i+1} \ldots s_{R_i}$is strictly lexicographically smaller than the string$s_{L_{i+1}}s_{L_{i+1}+1}\ldots s_{R_{i+1}}$.
翻译中…
Constraints
翻译中…
$1 \leq N \leq 2.5 \times 10^4$$N$is an integer.$S$is a string of length$N$consisting of$0$'s and$1$'s.
翻译中…
Input
翻译中…
Input is given from Standard Input in the following format:
翻译中…
N
S
翻译中…
Output
翻译中…
Print the answer.
翻译中…
样例
Input #1
7
0101010
Output #1
3
For $K = 3$, one sequence satisfying the conditition is $(L_1, R_1) = (1, 1), (L_2, R_2) = (3, 5), (L_3, R_3) = (6, 7)$. Indeed, $s_1 = 0$ is strictly lexicographically smaller than $s_3s_4s_5 = 010$, and $s_3s_4s_5 = 010$ is strictly lexicographically smaller than $s_6s_7 = 10$.
For $K \geq 4$, there is no sequence $\big((L_1, R_1), (L_2, R_2), \ldots, (L_K, R_K)\big)$ satisfying the condition.
Input #2
30
000011001110101001011110001001
Output #2
9
题目信息
题面与样例版权归 AtCoder 及出题人所有;中文翻译由 AI 生成(CI 管线),如有出入请以原文为准。