This is the easy version of the problem. The difference between the versions is that in this version, string $t$ consists of only '0' and '1'. You can hack only if you solved all versions of this problem.

Kevin has a binary string $s$ of length $n$. Kevin can perform the following operation:

• Choose two adjacent blocks of $s$ and swap them.

A block is a maximal substring$^{\text{∗}}$ of identical characters. Formally, denote $s[l,r]$ as the substring $s_l s_{l+1} \ldots s_r$. A block is $s[l,r]$ satisfying:

• $l=1$ or $s_l\not=s_{l-1}$.
• $s_l=s_{l+1} = \ldots = s_{r}$.
• $r=n$ or $s_r\not=s_{r+1}$.

Adjacent blocks are two blocks $s[l_1,r_1]$ and $s[l_2,r_2]$ satisfying $r_1+1=l_2$.

For example, if $s=\mathtt{000}\,\mathbf{11}\,\mathbf{00}\,\mathtt{111}$, Kevin can choose the two blocks $s[4,5]$ and $s[6,7]$ and swap them, transforming $s$ into $\mathtt{000}\,\mathbf{00}\,\mathbf{11}\,\mathtt{111}$.

Given a string $t$ of length $n$ consisting of '0', '1' and '?', Kevin wants to determine the minimum number of operations required to perform such that for any index $i$ ($1\le i\le n$), if $t_i\not=$ '?' then $s_i=t_i$. If it is impossible, output $-1$.

$^{\text{∗}}$A string $a$ is a substring of a string $b$ if $a$ can be obtained from $b$ by the deletion of several (possibly, zero or all) characters from the beginning and several (possibly, zero or all) characters from the end.

Input

Each test contains multiple test cases. The first line contains the number of test cases $t$ ($1 \le t \le 10^4$). The description of the test cases follows.

The first line of each test case contains a string $s$ consisting of '0' and '1'.

The second line of each test case contains a string $t$ consisting of '0' and '1'.

It is guaranteed that the lengths of $s$ and $t$ are the same.

It is guaranteed that the sum of the length of $s$ over all test cases will not exceed $4\cdot 10^5$.

Output

For each test case, output one integer — the minimum number of operations required. If it is impossible, output $-1$.

Note

In the first test case, the possible way is shown in the statement.

In the second test case, one possible way could be:

• Swap blocks $[2, 2], [3, 3]$, $s$ will become $\mathtt{001101}$.
• Swap blocks $[3, 4], [5, 5]$, $s$ will become $\mathtt{000111}$.
• Swap blocks $[1, 3], [4, 6]$, $s$ will become $\mathtt{111000}$.