Imp is really pleased that you helped him. But it you solve the last problem, his gladness would raise even more.

Let's define

for some set of integers

as the number of pairs
a
,
b
in

, such that:
$*a*$is strictly less than$*b*$;$*a*$divides$*b*$without a remainder.
You are to find such a set
, which is a subset of ${1, 2, ..., *n*}$ (the set that contains all positive integers not greater than $*n*$), that
.
Input
The only line contains two integers $*n*$ and $*k*$
.
Output
If there is no answer, print "No".
Otherwise, in the first line print "Yes", in the second — an integer $*m*$ that denotes the size of the set
you have found, in the second line print $*m*$ integers — the elements of the set
, in any order.
If there are multiple answers, print any of them.
Note
In the second sample, the valid pairs in the output set are $(1, 2)$, $(1, 4)$, $(1, 5)$, $(1, 6)$, $(2, 4)$, $(2, 6)$. Thus,
.
In the third example, the valid pairs in the output set are $(2, 4)$, $(4, 8)$, $(2, 8)$. Thus,
.
样例
3 3
No
6 6
Yes
5
1 2 4 5 6
8 3
Yes
4
2 4 5 8
题面与样例版权归 Codeforces 及出题人所有;中文翻译由 AI 生成(CI 管线),如有出入请以原文为准。